From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Eric Schulte" <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [babel] Tiny "problems"
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:48:53 -0700
Message-ID: <87vdg4qfsa.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87vdgpzf9i.fsf@mundaneum.com> <m2hbs6gfhc.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87ocmbyu57.fsf@mundaneum.com> <m2hbrq4o11.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87zl5im0mb.fsf@mundaneum.com> <87vdg5lluu.fsf@mundaneum.com>
	<m2my1hedvk.fsf@gmail.com> <m2k4wlcve1.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87pr6cabn7.fsf@mundaneum.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NLhsv-0002Wz-U9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:49:05 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NLhsr-0002Qq-3g
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:49:05 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45671 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NLhsq-0002Qh-V7
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:49:00 -0500
Received: from mail-ew0-f224.google.com ([209.85.219.224]:46673)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1NLhsq-0001aW-J7
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:49:00 -0500
Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so3752348ewy.26
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:48:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87pr6cabn7.fsf@mundaneum.com> (=?utf-8?Q?=22S=C3=A9bastien?=
	Vauban"'s message of "Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:12:44 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien?= Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Seb,

S=C3=A9bastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com> writes:
[...]
>
> Simply perfect!
>
> The only impact is that we cannot expect a multi-line block to be correct=
ly
> exported in the following case:
>
> -- set flag
> UPDATE dossier
> SET DossierSentToSector =3D @now
> WHERE ID
>     IN (SELECT actID_fk
>         FROM actions
>         WHERE (actID =3D 338 AND actEtat =3D 3))
>     AND F1SignDate < @firstDayOfThisMonth
>     AND DossierSentToSector IS NULL
>     AND <<ConditionForSector>>
>
> Because `AND' would be copied in front of every line, which may not be OK.
> But, for me, that's both perfectly comprehensible and perfectly acceptabl=
e.
>

you can't please everyone all the time, I think the current solution is
the best option

>
> Would the source block be mono-line, the above must perfectly work.
>
> Do we agree on this?
>

yes, it should work for single-line blocks

>
> Thank you very much, anyway, for this very nice fix, which fixes the above
> problem of commented block, and the indentation one... 2 flies with 1 sto=
ne.
>

Thanks for the idea.  Best -- Eric

>
> Best regards,
>   Seb