However the cleanest solution to me seems to be adding a header
argument, maybe named :resname which could be used to control the name
of the results, then passing an empty :resname argument could result in
the following

#+call: foo(x="bar") :resname

#+results:
...

and supplying a value would allow specific naming

#+call: foo(x="bar") :resname eric

#+results: eric
...

Does that sound like a good solution?  Is anyone using results names in
another way which this would not address?

Thanks -- Eric

Taru Karttunen <taruti@taruti.net> writes:

> Hello
>
> I have code like
>
> #+call: foo(x="bar")
>
> that produces
>
> #+results: foo(x="bar")
> ...
>
> Referring to the results with such a name elsewhere does not seem to
> work and is tedious. Is there a way to to rename the results?
>
> i.e.
> #+call: foo(x="bar") as foobar
> producing
> #+results: foobar
>
> - Taru Karttunen
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode