From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: org footnote bug? Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:35:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87vcsbfp3l.fsf@gmail.com> References: <878vp99cxa.fsf@bye.fritz.box> <87mxdohn87.fsf@gmail.com> <87k48sak5r.fsf@bye.fritz.box> <87ehz0h9tw.fsf@gmail.com> <87k48r7djs.fsf@bye.fritz.box> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53179) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9GnG-0008GT-Ba for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:36:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9GnC-00027h-D7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:36:54 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:62922) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9GnC-00027d-3B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:36:50 -0400 Received: by bkbzs2 with SMTP id zs2so810718bkb.0 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 06:36:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87k48r7djs.fsf@bye.fritz.box> (henry atting's message of "Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:12:23 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: henry atting Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org henry atting writes: > Thanks. Two things still differ from the stable version though: > > 1. When the first footnote is created the tag remains invisible: > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > Text... then I create a first footnote [1] > > [1] which appears without tag > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > With the second footnote the tag appears, both footnotes underneath: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Text... then I create a first footnote [1] ... then a second footnote [2] > > Footnotes: > > [1] which appears without tag > > [2] now the tag appears, with both footnotes underneath > ------------------------------------------------------------------ Right. I have pushed another fix for that. Could you confirm that it is working now? > 2. When going back to the footnote marker with org-footnote-action the > cursor stays on the left side of the marker. Yes, it's a feature. This way, you can move back and forth between reference and definition without creating new footnotes each time. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou