From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Bug: Tabbing error with asterisks [7.8.03] Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:41:19 +0200 Message-ID: <87vclpmzu8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <21A5E1E970CD46459ECBE86D6CC4B28C5B035212@spexch01.WindLogics.local> <878vin2qug.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47008) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCg5x-0004uM-Ew for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:46:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCg5v-0007jo-Gy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:46:33 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:57204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCg5v-0007ib-82 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:46:31 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id hj13so340271wib.12 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:46:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Ken Williams's message of "Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:59:41 +0000 (UTC)") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ken Williams Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Ken Williams writes: > Bastien gnu.org> writes: > >> Hit C-c ' twice and you'll have commas inserted before the lines >> starting with an asterisk. >> > > That works as a workaround, as long as I remember to do it. Is there a reason > not to automatically do this to the return value of doing "C-c C-c" on all > "#begin_src R" blocks? Not really. But adding commas for the rare occasions where C-c C-c on a src block will insert "*" at the beginning of lines will triggers questions from users who don't read the manual (there are a few.) Patch welcome. > Also, what if I need real commas in my literal stuff? Any way to > escape those? Just add one more comma, maybe? Let's handle this when we have a real use-case. Best, -- Bastien