From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] org-mobile agenda title
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 09:55:35 +0100
Message-ID: <87vcbjex6g.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <CAKq33ucev3yTJhtRtwPP6FAG-ks9OfaCcNaudbbH859LTpEKAw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKq33ufBhKUgwMpwVBfFSLaudvY2ofbbOyu63TJvaoRd0fSqEA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58146)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1TpEgG-0003uC-5V
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 03:55:41 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1TpEgF-0005XR-0x
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 03:55:40 -0500
Received: from mail-we0-f177.google.com ([74.125.82.177]:39421)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1TpEgE-0005Ws-RV
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 03:55:38 -0500
Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id x48so5426084wey.8
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 00:55:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAKq33ufBhKUgwMpwVBfFSLaudvY2ofbbOyu63TJvaoRd0fSqEA@mail.gmail.com>
	(Henning Weiss's message of "Wed, 5 Dec 2012 14:10:01 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Henning Weiss <hdweiss@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Henning,

Henning Weiss <hdweiss@gmail.com> writes:

> I was wondering why this patch was reversed in master. 

I think the line didn't change since 4a49e40d but I might be wrong.

> An updated version of the patch is attached, and a discussion of what
> it does is below.

Looks like the "updated" version is the same than the one you sent
first: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2012-01/msg00938.html

... and there is an updated one in the same thread:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2012-01/msg01073.html

Which one should I apply?  

Could you add a commit message with an Emacs changelog to your patch?

Thanks!

-- 
 Bastien