From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: About range references in the spreadsheet Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:48:24 +0100 Message-ID: <87vcae8vmv.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <20130116232437.b04189ed2c42c927f16b8d1c@gmail.com> <878v7g6vhz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87obgbcxdx.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87ehh6iti9.fsf@urmel.duenenhof-wilhelm.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34542) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U0apq-0003Hy-Ag for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:48:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U0apo-00060r-S2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:48:30 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172]:46402) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U0apo-00060k-Jz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:48:28 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id o1so3860165wic.5 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 08:48:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ehh6iti9.fsf@urmel.duenenhof-wilhelm.de> (H. Dieter Wilhelm's message of "Sun, 27 Jan 2013 15:35:10 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "H. Dieter Wilhelm" Cc: Xue Fuqiao , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Xue, Eric and Dieter, dieter@duenenhof-wilhelm.de (H. Dieter Wilhelm) writes: > (I would avoid the ambiguous expression "column two" since it is a > relative specification) alternatively > > The TWO REFERENCES expand to a field range from the row above the > current row, starting with two columns to the left up to the current > column. Yes... but this is a bit long. I finally used this: @@-1$-2..@@-1 @r{in the first row up, 3 fields from 2 columns on the left} Implicitely, the sentence ends with "up to the current one", which I think can be assumed to be obvious here. Let me know if you think this is still confusing. Best, -- Bastien