From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: Bug: #+STARTUP: overview and org-startup-folded have no effect
 [7.9.3e (7.9.3e-1032-g791a8d @ /home/horn/Repos/el/org-mode/lisp/)]
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 11:14:44 +0100
Message-ID: <87vc9vdwx7.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <87mwv7i7on.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <86ehgjcl98.fsf@somewhere.org>
	<87ehgji6y8.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87liarfczt.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<87zjz7gqh4.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54217)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1U5vqD-0004c7-VV
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 05:15:04 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1U5vq5-0005G2-0q
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 05:14:57 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87zjz7gqh4.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> (Tassilo Horn's message of
	"Thu, 14 Feb 2013 11:05:43 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Tassilo Horn <tsdh@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Tassilo,

Tassilo Horn <tsdh@gnu.org> writes:

> I have seven agenda files, all not too big (~10K on average), and I use
> an averagely performant computer (5 years old dual core laptop).  For
> me, the difference between `org-agenda-inhibit-startup' set to t or nil
> is not noticable at all.  In both cases, it's less than a second, and
> that's a time I can easily live with.

It really depends on what your agenda views are.

The real test is this: create a 50K file with folded one headline and
many second level TODO entries.  Then have an agenda view search for
those TODO items.  Do you get the same difference in this case?

If this difference is closer to 0 than to 1 sec, yes maybe we should
switch back to the default behavior.  Tests are very welcome for this.

Let me know,

-- 
 Bastien