From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: {New exporter] What happened to the export template Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:57:13 +0100 Message-ID: <87vc9s8ady.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <20130208210427.GB38099@BigDog.local> <87ehgqfr0o.fsf@gmail.com> <87zjz4mtkh.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87vc9s1dcu.fsf@pank.iue.private> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52810) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6l4h-000202-8s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 11:57:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6l4g-0002Qv-6M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 11:57:19 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]:63297) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6l4f-0002Qf-Vq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 11:57:18 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id ds1so1678393wgb.4 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 08:57:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87vc9s1dcu.fsf@pank.iue.private> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:34:57 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rasmus Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rasmus writes: > Not really. IMO, the old template added to much noise and didn't have > nice defaults. That's purely subjective, though! That's what this thread is for -- collect purely subjective feedback so we can get a rough idea of whether it's useful to implement this feature or not :) -- Bastien