From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: org-export raises stringp nil error Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 08:37:30 +0100 Message-ID: <87vc92735x.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87ip539io1.fsf@nautilus.nautilus> <87zjye96ph.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87vc928kcm.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: (Leo Liu's message of "Fri, 08 Mar 2013 15:16:57 +0800") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Liu Cc: Lele Gaifax , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org List-Id: emacs-orgmode.gnu.org Leo Liu writes: > On 2013-03-08 14:40 +0800, Bastien wrote: >> I find it hard to draw a clear line between regressions and bugs, >> especially since Org 7.9.x versions are way behind the current Org >> master branch. > > I think org-mode is better in ELPA, a better distribution channel than > the core for things like org-mode. Bundling it in emacs doesn't help > anybody. I strongly think otherwise: Emacs needs a good outline and editing tool. outline.el is not usable enough and I can see no other Emacs tool than Org-mode for exporting to HTML/LaTeX/ODT easily. I understand the temptation in terms of maintainance, but I think maintainance problems should not take priority over usefulness of the code. -- Bastien