From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [BUG] [ODT] Subtree export gives wrong footnote style Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 10:02:47 +0200 Message-ID: <87vc86u194.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87zjxmweqf.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5d5vonr.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58286) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UMZhe-0003bc-46 for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 04:02:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UMZhc-00061t-UN for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 04:02:54 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::234]:45192) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UMZhc-00061m-Os for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 04:02:52 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id r5so1543623wey.25 for ; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 01:02:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Christian Moe's message of "Sat, 30 Mar 2013 09:11:17 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Christian Moe Cc: Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Christian Moe writes: > * The new styles don't seem to get applied > > Quote and center blocks in footnotes do not get OrgFootnoteQuotations > style in my test. They remain Footnote. > > (You didn't add any OrgFootnoteVerse style, but I tried it out anyway. A > verse block inside a footnote appears as OrgVerse.) > > I include below a test Org fragment and attach the resulting ODT. Judging by the output (i.e. contents.xml), styles are applied: =E2=80=9CI see that it = is long=E2=80=9D, said Alice, =E2=80=9Cbut how can a tail be sad?=E2=80=9D Centered text here. The question is: why aren't these styles effectively applied on the output. It may be related to their definition, which can be incorrect. Regards, --=20 Nicolas Goaziou