From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [PATCH] Let =`make'= be an option to =`org-latex-pdf-process'=. Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 19:21:43 +0200 Message-ID: <87vc4sop20.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87k3l8q4vx.fsf@gmail.com> <87fvvwnank.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34927) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uu4Gj-0000Yb-AH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 13:21:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uu4Gi-0000sM-3T for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 13:21:33 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d]:53659) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uu4Gh-0000sF-Tv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 13:21:32 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id j13so5019641wgh.12 for ; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 10:21:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87fvvwnank.fsf@gmail.com> (Jambunathan K.'s message of "Tue, 02 Jul 2013 22:48:07 +0530") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jambunathan K Cc: feng shu , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Jambunathan K writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> Hello, >> >> feng shu writes: >> >>> From 63eba2e491a0c410b3841cbad2dd1a9f80416bca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Feng Shu >>> Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 11:52:10 +0800 >>> Subject: [PATCH] Let =`make'= be an option to =`org-latex-pdf-process'=. >>> >>> * ox-latex.el (org-latex-pdf-process): let =`make'= be a >>> preconfigured choice and change the wording of the docstring. >> >> I don't mind applying it, but shouldn't it as simple to provide >> a function that will call "make" instead? >> >> It's impossible to provide every solution in the wild for that. Is this >> one really necessary: it doesn't have complicated arguments. > > Can (other ...) be used here? See (info "(elisp) Composite Types") AFAIU, `other' means "whatever your answer is, always do the same", which is not what we want. If you want "give whatever you want and we'll use it", it should be a `string' type. But can't `function', which is already implemented, do the same anyway? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou