From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: help me get started with org-publish? Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:25:58 -0500 Message-ID: <87vbzxiwex.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87k3goz8r0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87eh6r72y9.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87vbzyduzj.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87zjp9izbr.fsf@gmail.com> <87d2m54xhl.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35172) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VgDyz-0003iP-9j for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:26:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VgDyt-0007n2-8d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:26:17 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:38957) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VgDyt-0007mx-2F for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:26:11 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VgDyr-0002c4-7x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:26:09 +0100 Received: from pool-108-7-96-134.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([108.7.96.134]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:26:09 +0100 Received: from ndokos by pool-108-7-96-134.bstnma.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:26:09 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien writes: > Hi Nick, > > Nick Dokos writes: > >> ISTR that Jay had parentheses around org-html-publish-to-html in his >> template, thereby making it (wrongly) into a function call. Somebody (don't >> remember who, sorry) pointed that out but maybe it's worth bringing it >> up again. > > Yep, I remember Robert Klein suggested this, but parentheses here are > fine, :publishing-function can be set to a list of functions (even if > there is just one function in the list!) > Ah, OK - I forgot about that. Sorry about the noise. > So... I guess we still need more info! Yes, a backtrace would be nice. -- Nick