From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions? Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:20:59 +0100 Message-ID: <87vbx2daj8.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87ob33nnwi.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87eh3yvgyg.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <3bc3c5a1-1c3f-4975-9dd6-3428aabb69be@default> <87ppniu06o.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <1c11f795-ca4a-45bf-9701-7645a0609ed1@default> <87lhy6l4k4.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87d2jh93jb.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87bnywtqx4.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <52E8E982.6070701@miszellen.de> <87k3dj6i88.fsf@gmail.com> <52E9137F.40406@miszellen.de> <87iot2re3y.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35890) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8Xsa-000165-GT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 11:20:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8XsV-0003O3-GE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 11:20:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87iot2re3y.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:40:01 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: Florian Beck , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Bastien writes: > Florian Beck writes: > >> But it is >> polite to provide alternatives for bindings that might be shadowed. > > Indeed. > > The only problem is C-c ^ since C-c C-^ is already taken. > > Btw, we could use C-c C-u (currently bound to `outline-up-heading') > instead of C-c C-^ (currently bound to `org-up-element') : in most > cases, `org-up-element' will achieve either the same or a better > job. I think that C-M-u is also a good candidate for `org-up-element'. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou