From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Baier Subject: Re: org-contacts development Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 12:30:29 +0200 Message-ID: <87vbswu6re.fsf@mailbox.org> References: <8761kxnno5.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36004) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WntVO-0005Jy-2S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 13:43:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WntVH-0007UY-3I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 13:43:42 -0400 Received: from mx1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.212]:34906) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WntVG-0007UN-Qq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 13:43:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8761kxnno5.fsf@gmail.com> (Alexis's message of "Fri, 23 May 2014 14:07:06 +1000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alexis Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello Alexis, On 2014-05-23 06:07 Alexis wrote: [...] > What would be useful would be an 'official', fleshed-out spec for > org-contacts data, which handles a greater range of contact-related > info. At the moment, for example, my org-contacts file makes use of the > properties: > > #+PROPERTY: LANDLINE > #+PROPERTY: MOBILE > #+PROPERTY: POST > #+PROPERTY: RESIDENCE > [...] > Fleshing out an extended spec for org-contacts data could be part of the > process of making org-contacts a first-class citizen of org-mode, and > provide a more solid foundation on which people can build (and share) > the org-contacts functionality they're after. And in my own particular > case, it would greatly facilitate my work in org-contacts / Android > Contacts integration. :-) > > What do people think? I, for one, would love to see org-contacts being improved in any way. Integrating this with MobileOrg would be an extremely helpful and something I have wanted since the day I started using org-contacts. About the spec, might it make sense to use a standard already in existence as a starting point or even a major inspiration? Something like vCard for example? Regards, -- Alexander Baier