From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:23:24 +0200 Message-ID: <87vbs4vqg3.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87tx7qxahl.fsf@gmail.com> <87ppie2c2h.fsf@gmail.com> <871tutx4t4.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54117) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WvSLw-000342-CS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 10:21:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WvSLn-0007q7-Tl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 10:21:12 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:43019) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WvSLn-0007pv-NR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 10:21:03 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WvSLf-00005Z-1D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:20:55 +0200 Received: from 109.201.154.189 ([109.201.154.189]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:20:55 +0200 Received: from rasmus by 109.201.154.189 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:20:55 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Eric Schulte writes: >> >> I also ran across this need. What I had in mind was that certain todo > >> types would be treated as inline. >> For instance, if "P" was a member of this hypothetical >> org-inline-todo-keywords, then >> >> * P a paragraph >> some contents >> >> would be rendered as >> >> some contents >> >> by the exporter, no matter the backend. >> >> Such a feature is more generic and would be useful in other contexts ; >> and the LaTeX-related issues discussed in this thread would be solved >> using something like >> >> * INLINE appendix >> \appendix >> * Appendix 1 >> > > Why TODO types rather than a tag? IMO using a TODO type would conflate > task management and document structuring. What do you think about the > attached patch which should add this functionality to the core. I would be happy to see this change in core, as I use ignoreheading-like tags all of the time. On the other hand it's not particularly elegant, but it's already in ox-beamer.el, so that's probably OK. Thanks, Rasmus -- Er du tosset for noge' lårt!