From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thorsten Jolitz Subject: Re: ML problems? Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 14:08:15 +0200 Message-ID: <87vbr6wx8w.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87bnsybwz1.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41909) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X4qfy-0005jz-2c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 08:08:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X4qfq-0004Sh-6n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 08:08:42 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:59064) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X4qfq-0004SU-0D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 08:08:34 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X4qfo-0002sM-2J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 14:08:32 +0200 Received: from g231106182.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.231.106.182]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 14:08:32 +0200 Received: from tjolitz by g231106182.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 14:08:32 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nick Dokos writes: > I think there is a problem with the ML or maybe gmane. I have received > several replies through private Cc: but even though those replies are > also cc:ed to the list, they haven't appeared either when I read gmane > through gnus or through the web. I also went looking for them on the > list archives > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2014-07/threads.html > > and did not find them there either. This suggests a problem with the > mailing list, rather than gmane. > > Anybody else notice this? Yes, the gmane group is basically dead again, and one of my posts appeared some 14h after posting it. Formerly, this problem was always solved by Bastien sending a PM to Lars ;) -- cheers, Thorsten