From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Bug: wrong interpretation of LaTeX [8.2.6 (8.2.6-47-ge3d2c1-elpa
 @ c:/Users/beffa/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20140526/)]
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 10:26:48 +0200
Message-ID: <87vbqkikzb.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <CAKrPhPO_yCOSE3uQcGAMscHXqa1qtBro=R-mcfSTtGvwTxaf3A@mail.gmail.com>
	<87fvhpjnmf.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAKrPhPOh1tkCtG49s2A3LgHauXVddE7f4+uDbBaZpiy=2zcnrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40119)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1XAxJ2-00024A-9Y
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 04:26:23 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1XAxIs-0001gS-EP
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 04:26:16 -0400
Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::197]:44619)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1XAxIs-0001gN-8f
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 04:26:06 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAKrPhPOh1tkCtG49s2A3LgHauXVddE7f4+uDbBaZpiy=2zcnrQ@mail.gmail.com>
	(Federico Beffa's message of "Fri, 25 Jul 2014 22:39:29 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org> writes:

> Of course \[ 1+1 \] is valid LaTeX syntax, just as inline
> \begin{displaymath} 1+1 \end{displaymath} is valid.

But \begin{displaymath} 1+1 \end{displaymath} isn't valid in an Org
paragraph.

> In my opinion a construct which will be displayed on a line by itself
> and with some space separating it from the preceding and the following
> text lines such as "\[ ... \]" would be better represented as a
> latex-environment and not an inline latex-fragment. In this way the
> org-mode text representation with proper fill-paragraph handling would
> be much more readable and consistent with the meaning of the syntax
> that it borrowed.

That would prevent \[...\] to be recognized within a paragraph, as in
the example above. I don't think it's worth removing it as long as there
is a latex-environment alternative for it.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou