From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: possible correction to manual Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 16:23:58 +0200 Message-ID: <87vbqhbdm0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59253) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XBofN-0006hH-0d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 13:25:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XBofC-0005Lg-Lv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 13:24:52 -0400 Received: from mail-s76.mailgun.info ([184.173.153.204]:53996) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XBofC-0005Ho-G2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 13:24:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Samuel Wales's message of "Thu, 10 Jul 2014 19:19:38 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Samuel Wales Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Samuel, this has been frequently discussed and although timestamps are allowed in headlines, we don't want to encourage users to use them like this. The footnote is still relevant IMHO. Best, -- Bastien