From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Clemente <n142857@gmail.com>
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IEhUTUwgbGlzdHMgYXJlIGluY2x1ZGluZyBwYXJhZ3JhcGhz?=
 =?UTF-8?B?ICg8bGk+PHA+4oCmPC9wPjwvbGk+KQ==?=
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 14:48:09 +0700
Message-ID: <87vbphrow6.wl-n142857@gmail.com>
References: <87ppgg26wd.wl%n142857@gmail.com> <87egwvdtt1.fsf@gmail.com>
	<871tst24wq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55020)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n142857@gmail.com>) id 1XLp0v-0006OE-Cx
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 03:48:38 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n142857@gmail.com>) id 1XLp0m-0002rN-5J
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 03:48:29 -0400
Received: from mail-pd0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::230]:63846)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n142857@gmail.com>) id 1XLp0l-0002rC-LO
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 03:48:20 -0400
Received: by mail-pd0-f176.google.com with SMTP id y10so19865628pdj.21
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <871tst24wq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>, org-mode Mailinglist <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

El Wed, 06 Aug 2014 14:12:21 +0200 Nicolas Goaziou va escriure:
>=20
> I understand that "paragraph is alone in its item" is not a good test to
> skip paragraph wrappers. I'm still confused about what a good test would
> be. In particular, what should be done in the following cases
>=20
>   - item
>   - item
>     - sublist
>     resuming item
>

  You mean =E2=80=9Eitem=E2=80=9C contains text+ol+p? Rather strange=E2=80=
=A6 I first thought that =E2=80=9Eresuming item=E2=80=9C would be a continu=
ation line of =E2=80=9Esublist=E2=80=9C (that is, as if =E2=80=9Esublist re=
suming item=E2=80=9C were the only item of the sublist).
  But why not, as a general rule, avoid <p> for the first elements of lists=
? That is, don't output paragraph+list+paragraph, but text+list+paragraph.
  This works for the simple case (<li>text</li>) and allows the complex one=
s (<li>text<p>aa</p><ol></ol><whatever></whatever></li>).

 =20
> i.e., (paragraph plain-list paragraph), and
>=20
>   - outer
>=20
>     another paragraph
>=20
>     - inner
>     - simple list
>=20
> i.e., are nested plain-lists independent relatively to paragraph
> wrappers skipping. I think so, but I'd rather make sure.
>=20

I'd also say text+p+ol.

Rather unusual syntax anyway=E2=80=A6 but it shouldn't break the simple <li=
>Plain item</li> (now broken).