emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
To: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [patch, ox] Unnumbered headlines
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:53:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vboflkil.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tx4020lh.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Sun, 21 Sep 2014 22:13:46 +0200")

Hello,

Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:

> With the last patch it gets weird when you have mixed trees, like this:
>
>     * numbered
>     ** unnumbered 
>     :PROPERTIES:
>     :UNNUMBERED: t
>     :END:
>
> The LaTeX output is:
>
>     \section{numbered}
>     \label{sec-1}
>     \subsection*{unnumbered}
>     \label{unnumbered-sec-0-1}
>
> Perhaps it would be nicer to use a single counter rather than two?
> Right now, this
>
>     * numbered1
>     * unnumbered2 
>     :PROPERTIES:
>     :UNNUMBERED: t
>     :END:
>     * numbered2
>     * unnumbered2
>     :PROPERTIES:
>     :UNNUMBERED: t
>     :END:
>
> produces
>
>     \section{numbered1}
>     \label{sec-1}
>     \section*{unnumbered2}
>     \label{unnumbered-sec-1}
>     \section{numbered2}
>     \label{sec-2}
>     \section*{unnumbered2}
>     \label{unnumbered-sec-2}
>
> But perhaps this is nicer?
>
>     \label{sec-1}
>     \label{unnumbered-sec-2}
>     \label{sec-3}
>     \label{unnumbered-sec-4}
>
> In particular for mixed, nested trees. 

I think it would be nice to keep "sec-NUM", with NUM matching current
numbering, for numbered headlines. I'm not against a simple global
counter for unnumbered headlines:

  \label{sec-1}
  \label{unnumbered-1}
  \label{sec-2}
  \label{unnumbered-2}

or in the following example

  * H1
  ** H2
     :PROPERTIES:
     :UNNUMBERED: t
     :END:
  *** H3
  *** H4
  * H5
  ** H6

the labelling scheme

 \label{sec-1}
 \label{unnumbered-1}
 \label{unnumbered-2}
 \label{unnumbered-3}
 \label{sec-2}
 \label{sec-2-1}

>> This is incorrect.
>>
>>   #+options: num:nil
>>
>>   * Headline
>>     :PROPERTIES:
>>     :CUSTOM_ID: test
>>     :END:
>>     This is a link to [[#test]].
>>
>> will produce
>>
>>   \section*{Headline}
>>   \label{sec-1}
>>   This is a link to \hyperref[sec-1]{Headline}.
>
> Is *my statement* incorrect or is the current *output* incorrect?

The former, but see below.

> On my PC, when I refer to an unnumbered headline I get
> \ref{UNNUMBERED}, but since it's after a \section* it will produce
> nothing or a subsequent element.  But I *did* forget to try the patch
> with emacs -q and maybe that's why I'm not seeing \hyperref's. . .

Actually, there was a small bug in the code, now fixed. `latex' back-end
is expected to use "hyperref" when headline in unnumbered.

> To be clear: you are happy if it uses the \hyperref[·]{·} in LaTeX,
> but not \ref{·} for unnumbered?

You are the LaTeX expert. Isn't it reasonable?


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-22 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-08 13:39 [patch, ox] Unnumbered headlines Rasmus
2014-08-08 22:35 ` Alan L Tyree
2014-08-09  1:04 ` [patch, ox] Unnumbered headlines - early test Alan L Tyree
2014-08-09  7:47 ` [patch, ox] Unnumbered headlines Detlef Steuer
2014-08-11 14:18 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-08-11 15:37   ` Rasmus
2014-08-12  8:58     ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-09-20 16:02       ` Rasmus
2014-09-20 20:34         ` Alan L Tyree
2014-09-21 13:12         ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-09-21 14:37           ` Rasmus
2014-09-21 19:40             ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-09-21 20:13               ` Rasmus
2014-09-22 15:53                 ` Nicolas Goaziou [this message]
2014-09-23  0:35                   ` Rasmus
2014-09-23  1:10                     ` Thomas S. Dye
2014-09-26  7:51                     ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-09-26 13:48                       ` Rasmus
2014-09-27  8:19                         ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-09-30 22:54                       ` Rasmus
2014-10-02  0:35                         ` Rasmus
2014-10-03  7:56                         ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-10-03  8:49                           ` Sebastien Vauban
2014-10-03 10:26                           ` Rasmus
2014-10-03 20:14                             ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-10-03 20:31                               ` Rasmus
2014-10-05  8:06                                 ` Nicolas Goaziou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87vboflkil.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr \
    --to=mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=rasmus@gmx.us \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).