From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jorge.alfaro-murillo@yale.edu (Jorge A. Alfaro-Murillo) Subject: Re: Citation syntax: a revised proposal Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 13:39:51 -0500 Message-ID: <87vbj166q0.fsf@yale.edu> References: <87k2zjnc0e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87a90e83ki.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <874mql7r2h.fsf@yale.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38963) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YNQee-0005VF-UC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 13:44:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YNQea-0003gw-8r for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 13:44:24 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:34217) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YNQea-0003gr-1l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 13:44:20 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YNQeY-0001lF-2f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 19:44:18 +0100 Received: from nat-130-132-173-151.central.yale.edu ([130.132.173.151]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 19:44:18 +0100 Received: from jorge.alfaro-murillo by nat-130-132-173-151.central.yale.edu with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 19:44:18 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org John Kitchin writes: > Stefan Nobis writes: > >> Hmmm... nowadays one uses biblatex[fn:1] (with its companion >> biber) which makes hacking bibliography styles quite easy (in >> LaTeX; compared to customizing bst files). I do not think that >> the current discussion will lead to writing bib-styles in Lisp >> instead of LaTeX (at least not in the foreseeable future). > > This is not universally true. None of the journals we submit to > accept biblatex, only bibtex. I don't know of any major science > publishers that use biblatex. Same here. Journals either do not support LaTeX or support LaTeX and BibTeX. -- Jorge.