From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [ox, patch] #+SUBTITLE Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 12:47:19 +0200 Message-ID: <87vbhhxx3c.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87y4miv7y6.fsf@gmx.us> <87a8yxi0zf.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87k2y1qfpi.fsf@gmx.us> <87d23sdtod.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87oanct43z.fsf@gmx.us> <874mp4dkeb.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87bnjct08z.fsf@gmx.us> <87a8yv0w8v.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87twx24vt5.fsf@gmx.us> <87d23pzczl.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <871tk5jvyx.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54815) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yctgs-00009p-22 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 06:46:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yctgo-0003SS-J6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 06:46:38 -0400 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:47550) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yctgo-0003SM-DD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 06:46:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <871tk5jvyx.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Tue, 31 Mar 2015 12:35:18 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rasmus Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rasmus writes: >> For the record, if the situation ever rises again, I think that >> a keyword can be added to "ox.el" only if >> >> - it is supported at least in every major back-end (ASCII, HTML, >> LaTeX, ODT and Texinfo) >> - it comes with a toggle in the OPTIONS line e.g. keyword:nil > > For subtitle I'm reusing :with-title. If you think it necessary, I can > add a :with-subtitle, but I didn't think it was necessary. It doesn't apply here since SUBTITLE isn't defined in "ox.el". You can do whatever you think is appropriate for SUBTITLE. > OK. So with the above the in mind the game plan seems to be: > > - Remove DESCRIPTION/KEYWORD from it's current position in org.texi > to backend descriptions and retain them in relevant backends. Correct. > This imply some repetition, but also allows greater details, > e.g. with latex we can point to the hyperref template. Indeed. > - In the subtitle patch documentation should be documented in the > relevant backend sections. Exactly. Regards,