From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: ox-koma-letter.el: subtree vs buffer, precedence of properties, superscript transcoding Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 04:56:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87vbef16bg.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87ioafv2ar.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44249) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z7ENl-0002r8-RH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 22:56:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z7ENi-0006ab-Lq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 22:56:17 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:53354) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z7ENi-0006aX-Ea for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 22:56:14 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z7ENd-0000a7-Uc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 04:56:10 +0200 Received: from 90.163.164.75 ([90.163.164.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 04:56:09 +0200 Received: from rasmus by 90.163.164.75 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 04:56:09 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Myles, Thanks for your report. Myles English writes: > 1) subtree scope export results differently than buffer scope export It seems changes set in properties are not registered as changes in the file cf. 2. Thus, some fields you'd like to get after the LCO file aren't detected as changed. > 2) a signature specified in the subtree property does not take > precedence in subtree export Somehow, when you specify it as a property it's not detected as :inbuffer-signature. > 3) superscripts on the dates behave differently in the subject and > date properties, i.e. 20\textsuperscript{th} & 20^{th} It depends on whether the keyword is interpreted. SUBJECT should be interpreted. I think it was added in the patch in Eric's thread last week. I will push it when I get back to that computer. Hope this helps, Rasmus PS: You can use special headings for specifying stuff like addresses, and maybe even subjects (I don't remember). -- Sådan en god dansk lagereddike kan man slet ikke bruge mere