From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Missing `Specific Header Arguments' in Manual Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 10:29:34 +0200 Message-ID: <87vabyv9ch.fsf@bzg.fr> References: <8D4BA262-9F3F-412B-8DF1-5F6A6E3E671C@ucsd.edu> <87o9hzf3mu.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87a7tifcme.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44671) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFy0F-0000xJ-5l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 May 2018 04:29:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFy0E-0006NG-6F for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 May 2018 04:29:43 -0400 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: emacs-orgmode , "Berry, Charles" , Kaushal Modi Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Kaushal Modi writes: > >> In the Org 9.1 version manual, it was possible to search ":eval" and find >> what I was looking for. In 9.2 manual, very few of the header arguments are >> documented with the colon prefix. > > I removed all colon prefixes, so it is a bug if any header argument is > prefixed with a colon. Why did you remove colon prefixes? The colon is part of the header argument, so I'd thought it is natural to include it in searches. >> So searching is not consistent any more. > > Of course, it is. Now, you can search by topic. E.g., `eval' header > argument belongs to "Limit Code block evaluation", which is a sub-topic > of "Evaluation Code Blocks". This was clearly not possible before, > because unrelated arguments were located in the same section. > > You can also search the index alphabetically. There is a section called "Header arguments" in the new org-manual.org. The natural expectation is for this section to list all header arguments. Looking for ":eval" or "eval" in here will bring nothing, which is not very natural. As Kaushal said, the previous listing, though perhaps inconsistent, helped discoverability of arguments a lot. (In general, it is good to have all entities of a kind listed somewhere.) What can we do to improve the manual here? -- Bastien