From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] org: org-get-priority-function: Clearly state that this
 is a holder for a name of the function
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 11:15:04 +0200
Message-ID: <87v9szegyv.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <2391111569718490@vla3-bebe75876e15.qloud-c.yandex.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34474)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1iHlaO-0004qj-9S
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 05:15:17 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1iHlaM-0006H7-SL
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 05:15:15 -0400
Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.199]:51755)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
 id 1iHlaM-0006EO-MU
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 05:15:14 -0400
In-Reply-To: <2391111569718490@vla3-bebe75876e15.qloud-c.yandex.net> (Anton
 Latukha's message of "Sun, 29 Sep 2019 03:54:50 +0300")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
 <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Anton Latukha <anton@latukha.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Anton Latukha <anton@latukha.com> writes:

> Additionally state that this is a holder of a function name, so the
> simple user did not get confused.

Your patch doesn't sound right. The value could be a lambda function, or
a symbol with a function value. Besides, "function name" is confusing.
It could mean, e.g., a string.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou