From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id QGXJIgUuuF5qZQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 10 May 2020 16:38:29 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id ELKSChMuuF5jBQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 10 May 2020 16:38:43 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8B4F94050B for ; Sun, 10 May 2020 16:38:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:51106 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXoyP-0004cw-JJ for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 12:38:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33222) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXoy5-0004cj-Se for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 12:38:21 -0400 Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.199]:60633) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXoy4-0001fK-A3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 12:38:21 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 185.131.40.67 Received: from localhost (40-67.ipv4.commingeshautdebit.fr [185.131.40.67]) (Authenticated sender: admin@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DEE7FF806; Sun, 10 May 2020 16:38:16 +0000 (UTC) From: Nicolas Goaziou To: Ihor Radchenko Subject: Re: [patch suggestion] Mitigating the poor Emacs performance on huge org files: Do not use overlays for PROPERTY and LOGBOOK drawers References: <87h7x9e5jo.fsf@localhost> <875zdpia5i.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87y2qi8c8w.fsf@localhost> <87r1vu5qmc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <877dxl5hwu.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87ftc9jcx5.fsf@localhost> <87368958jl.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87eers2wft.fsf@localhost> <87368815qf.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87o8qv536k.fsf@localhost> <87h7wnzw3v.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87lflz4v7l.fsf@localhost> Mail-Followup-To: Ihor Radchenko , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 18:38:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87lflz4v7l.fsf@localhost> (Ihor Radchenko's message of "Mon, 11 May 2020 00:21:18 +0800") Message-ID: <87v9l3ycco.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.199; envelope-from=mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr; helo=relay9-d.mail.gandi.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/10 12:38:16 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: -1.01 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [-1.01 / 13.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.53895674788129]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.51.188.0/24:c]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.08), country: US(-0.00), ip: 209.51.188.17(-0.54)]; DWL_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[209.51.188.17:server fail]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: eggs.gnu.org]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:209.51.188.0/24, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr,emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[nicolasgoaziou.fr]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[209.51.188.17:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.51.188.17:from]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-TUID: 5XvAHvbXggmh Ihor Radchenko writes: > If you want, I can test the file without :LOGBOOK: lines tomorrow. Don't worry, it doesn't matter now. > No, there are only 9 'outline overlays in the folded buffer if we do not > create overlays for drawers. This is because outline-hide-sublevels > called by org-overview is calling outline-flag-region on the whole > buffer thus removing all the 'outline overlays in buffer > (remove-overlays from to 'invisible 'outline) and re-creating a single > overlay for each top-level heading. You're talking about "overview" (org-overview), whereas I'm talking about "contents view" (org-content). They are not the same. In the latter, you show every headline in the buffer, so you have one overlay per headline. > Now, thinking second time about this, using the following for > org-flag-region would achieve similar effect: > > (remove-overlays from to 'invisible 'outline) > (remove-overlays from to 'invisible 'org-hide-drawer) > > Now sure if it is going to break org-cycle though. > What do you think? This is already the case. See first line of `org-flag-region'. Regards,