From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id GI6ICI50dGU1jwAAG6o9tA:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 15:07:10 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id GI6ICI50dGU1jwAAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 15:07:10 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8777363FE6 for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2023 15:07:09 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b="jwtYmxL/"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1702130829; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=TEFoi+0iE5YaU2inJizDza03QM6kvTZkChZ23UbAreU=; b=JWAvYrTuXALvj2bSMl5X8ZRLJoQozIyamMhfqspr9QAOpCw8RXIsHPSJ4A0OXT0UMa0jqw LMAgb5R3yEZNXqqhKNk2WRKaixwNN+nezIHVDLY0pYYIOyVdsE8Y2pqzYMCPos3VXxIhPV TloFq5xhRTO0Z7JOwozxL3bc60I8WHHj1UKzEF3dhmerFs923jD4oKMwcZN/n7x93bue53 S0B7B/YlSV6wZMhgRZBmFaCC9VuQgHndX4OCMCYgk6A9Ubk/qZ969aWnQeSjZDywzTUWW4 j6DIIPNPWJ2KX6UBT3pjSfwYpyqeP/wa4LTrVTCuVPCA0Vrg5SbyZlU0XiTCUw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b="jwtYmxL/"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1702130829; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=MMawAORS8nwyw3zLIhm8sxC5uhl8O0teD1c7zD65F+h/Zwsv+U/3P4ESBRyCk3izN9Tm+3 JEQM6YfBAvNSig/j735KZoqNF4F5bgiW+j7ixqLcZkz6pRE3o06AeeLM6x7ujKWvxygPha jg0vR8sVw23isvXu1SQxe4A/bxm3osCll3TDl6GeypW4tZ2viB6sNFj1T9sx9p3CI+ERVR SCXUZDZprDENwaZEurHoXjhSWlvf9XATA8P+tK/+3ISflDm3HqYFpxgK5Cb306qcFCKMid s80+jeN8m/eulnAHjAh7Lhzp+AcYl43268Vm0NHZEdRLXMOJYsQ+tP9lTUYJMA== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rBxyI-0007IV-RC; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 09:06:22 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rBxyG-0007Dz-3r for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 09:06:20 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rBxyC-0001cT-0L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 09:06:19 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFD4B240028 for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2023 15:06:12 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1702130773; bh=JapCoaDD/f7iBcD7AJHNU6zDm8ddSzcaUjNApfQ7QQ4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=jwtYmxL/gTsWuURhTKvYPLzQQLLcjRqTei9BNyAb5AUmMz92y8JuekXGp0GbHPZN0 FN27Q5xHrZ6cHEZp51YM3qMA0k/jzSaLXwBSR95dy9W5Ps6yAElvBOdUxvwG65SzpC bv7rnh3aEK7oi2OOoxxdurC7ZLvUR8+EUoVFNxGgDHOxxhJFIb/qMtcu1COvMVCGUU 5naajXvOm8HSaYB7J/GPqijJ7BbAWZLOVi3Rf+EAKvhIcTW3N65SRqRmecIGHfFUq0 4ZVyNfK1l8AXXmS69pVFHQOkCmqJy3KtcxQ86qtX/tN0huy+S1OhLHz/6KnL/3NPh8 S22vVtaoT3pIg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4SnVD42SpSz9rxK; Sat, 9 Dec 2023 15:06:12 +0100 (CET) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Adam Porter Cc: bzg@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Re: Provide org-insert-subitem In-Reply-To: <0d03a623-14a5-4f65-8f12-bf749f934449@alphapapa.net> References: <875zg9trjo.fsf@bzg.fr> <0d03a623-14a5-4f65-8f12-bf749f934449@alphapapa.net> Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2023 14:09:19 +0000 Message-ID: <87v897qxgw.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.02 X-Spam-Score: -7.02 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8777363FE6 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-TUID: ByIwvCpe6dkF Adam Porter writes: > Well, it's been a few years since I forgot to bump this thread. [0] :) > I just rediscovered it after wondering why the command > org-insert-subheading still doesn't have a default binding. May we > revisit this? I find myself wanting to insert a subheading almost every > day, and I have to "M-x org-insert-subheading RET". > > Of course I could bind it myself, and in one of my configs I have, but I > still think it deserves a default binding, even if it were to be a > "smart" command that worked like org-table-copy-down when in a table and > does org-insert-subheading otherwise (because I still think that "S-RET" > is an obviously appropriate binding for this command). > > What do you think? =) I think that it still makes sense, even after all these years ;) Would you be interested to submit a patch? -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at