From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id 8NiNEp/9uGWZSwAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:46:07 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id 8NiNEp/9uGWZSwAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:46:07 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=ORLFjEUS; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1706622367; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=ywljOb1+1IZJ0QLk+8jVe7byBZuElcvP6+LdPuNq9uY=; b=TopGXllx0SekNCMhkrDbs5OI8irPKIr3GxizaGV4pRm4w+oKDD+bfatA+Ch6ogN4gTFEQM La2O4DKBthfPQpC4sMNNqRClcgvH5h6XD/WuwDYikq5xJupOdytxqY4K7MZ4gjfq9i6PMw mhMQiSK3aVit/E0oT7d8dHP4Xn8Npw2oviZgcKFNSzO8sCtIifVWMTRAFH1O2i9k5pdx6E Q8NhXy2/MYh99KGRNK3iv+QeBFxiCwyxmNGOigdCSDb2t0yso+9oxpTVR4ZZoveZb28GsM NAH8HZivpl7YxmXEfsURGAbRLTPJELR94cIcVIlcBHnp/omc/p/fYvP96Pnh2Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=ORLFjEUS; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1706622367; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=uG6gcnewCA+/I/Vw9BSiGDkRVVMY1hCRdy5sUj/pcJLV4YHK23Mkfzoe77jxRvEEiQxoX8 9E4cq0Re5NRFl/Xfp5q6l+/RREJ1Le1EETJXfu0wCHE8kDVbSDUd6yxefCp3gTU99OatNk rBNl2IUDlSnUDGRohKJsELGQxRmdpy93wNMlkuhbeG9TwfMOAyeouzkEm6tLmQJE+uOtoS C2UpPCGltOyyDE/iI0zomn8aVE6J9IWqf551CZ/bsN9jyeMV+Q2Pc9GiNk1ZRqTHbtyeCh jNNKKa9cKE3cgtPkYoLjTOSQdnvu48NmmPGINR9bYnW1QgbY2HjwEhMF4YKv2w== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A71F60AEC for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:46:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rUoQI-0004aR-9w; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 08:45:10 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rUoQA-0004Zn-Bj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 08:45:05 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rUoQ7-0000Bv-Hj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 08:45:02 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54DE6240029 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:44:55 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1706622295; bh=xLfKhwjau626xzgQKkm/IvC1uLIY5XofyV1AHJpXX6M=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From; b=ORLFjEUSSIgVo4wHWdFf8RNElAuN11oT42NpGcfqTLC2hyF+RppQrhYCDK1olGgO0 ywA8JeELOyM98kIpnJgWCOvILwKqV65Y2Z6acle2F9evneQJLuH+So61VAjvYQpZ+O WuqrJMtDQOroRyM8P/slc3AVu3QePZDcPb9E85uygr5Dcw+E/UHe7xuXgfL3ZIP9Jn 1DaiY7hPh85xae8Sk+YfZqE2UltaE3CkaPERJ6gYp30AcAMFZqlgu28KEzpyKzKap8 /ZBHXCsT6sTPlfFtZ3uFmhgk7OZNYBrTDednEs7oKFJ4xeBY/iyjF678Yvi3wnSuut /UnIwRtGiZatA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4TPRHV4SV4z6twQ; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:44:54 +0100 (CET) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Ihor Radchenko Cc: John Mathena , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Re: [BUG] Child's visibility property is overridden by parent's [9.5.2 (9.5.2-gbc8c3e @ /home/john/.emacs.d/straight/build/org/) In-Reply-To: <87tucu99od.fsf@localhost> References: <87tucu99od.fsf@localhost> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:48:26 +0000 Message-ID: <87v87bue39.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.67 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-Spam-Score: -7.67 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 3A71F60AEC X-TUID: DRrmRhfDbipi Ihor Radchenko writes: > I would say that the existing behaviour is a confusing and might be > considered as a bug. However, it may not always be straightforward how > to deal with different combinations of VISIBILITY setting for > ancestor/descendent headings. Consider the following example: > > * Foo > :PROPERTIES: > :VISIBILITY: folded > :END: > ** Bar > :PROPERTIES: > :VISIBILITY: content > :END: > *** Baz > > Foo is supposed to be folded, but it is unclear how to process Bar. > Should Bar's contents be visible? Should it be folded? My conclusion is that Bar should be visible. This will be consistent with how VISIBILITY overrides document-wide STARTUP settings. Also, the comment in one of Org tests I was concerned about was inaccurate - it tested for a slightly different bug. Fixed, on main. https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=a5c977b43 -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at