From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bastien.guerry@wikimedia.fr>
Subject: Re: problem with label in latex export
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:41:42 +0200
Message-ID: <87tyli1zyx.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <4C8A19AA.6080504@indraneel.info>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43876 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OyBWx-0002BX-JY
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:41:44 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1OyBWw-0001v6-8P
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:41:43 -0400
Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:33649)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1OyBWv-0001uz-W6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:41:42 -0400
Received: by wwb24 with SMTP id 24so7110460wwb.30
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:41:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4C8A19AA.6080504@indraneel.info> (Indraneel Majumdar's message
	of "Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:12:34 +0530")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Indraneel Majumdar <indraneel@indraneel.info>
Cc: orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi Indraneel,

Indraneel Majumdar <indraneel@indraneel.info> writes:

> Since orgmode already uses hyperref, is there any reason why
> \phantomsection is not added before \label by default? 

Can you explain why \phantomsection is useful here?

Thanks,

-- 
 Bastien