From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Maus Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow inactive timestamps in org-expiry (copy of lost patch) Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 21:07:22 +0200 Message-ID: <87tycj7w9h.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> References: <20110328202149.67a32bdc@hsdev.com> <1057.1301338513@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="pgp-sign-Multipart_Tue_May_24_21:07:21_2011-1"; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36597) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QOwwv-0006l1-TS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2011 15:07:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QOwwu-0005Nl-Sg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2011 15:07:25 -0400 Received: from mail.xlhost.de ([213.202.242.118]:51783 helo=mysql1.xlhost.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QOwwu-0005N7-J0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2011 15:07:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1057.1301338513@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --pgp-sign-Multipart_Tue_May_24_21:07:21_2011-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII At Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:55:13 -0400, Nick Dokos wrote: > > Marcel van der Boom wrote: > > > This patch is what is attached to the message displayed at [1]. I have > > been using this patch for a while and it works fine. From searching it > > looks like this patch was 'forgotten', but I may have overlooked > > something. > > > > If the patch was rejected, you can ignore me. If it was forgotten I'd > > like to request to include it. > > > > I don't think it was rejected outright, it looks as if it was > inadvertently dropped. Probably part of the reason is that David sent > the patches as application/octet-stream so they never made it to > patchwork (was patchwork even running back in 2009? I don't remember > when it was set up.) IIRC Patchwork was set up in Summer 2010. > The third part might be that it was Dec. 31, so people were out > partying instead of applying patches (unimaginable, I know :-) ) Wow, I really did send this one Dec 31st 2009 - how time flies! Best, -- Davdi -- OpenPGP... 0x99ADB83B5A4478E6 Jabber.... dmjena@jabber.org Email..... dmaus@ictsoc.de --pgp-sign-Multipart_Tue_May_24_21:07:21_2011-1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iF4EABEIAAYFAk3cAekACgkQma24O1pEeOYMIAD+Jui/mkbu4GJTa1zNBd0GrdDf iqsNO+wn1WEXzzdExhQBAJXRb/JWir2S/c7Yui0OK63Srkb8Tt+rNz/yr2SAMkPQ =/g/i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pgp-sign-Multipart_Tue_May_24_21:07:21_2011-1--