From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: Org release 7.8.08 (BUGFIX-only release) Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 21:36:40 +0200 Message-ID: <87ty0zz3uf.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <878vieulvs.fsf@altern.org> <4F79EAF7.7020403@amlog.co.uk> <87fwcmt2ti.fsf@altern.org> <87y5qcspjx.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87398km10m.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56729) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFW0p-0003UW-7R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 15:37:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFW0n-0000jP-1q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 15:36:58 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:52341) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFW0m-0000iu-RA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 15:36:56 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SFW0j-0006Yj-1D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 21:36:53 +0200 Received: from pd9eb5dc0.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.235.93.192]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 21:36:52 +0200 Received: from Stromeko by pd9eb5dc0.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 21:36:52 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien writes: > Not sure I understand: the tag release_7.8.08 *is* on the server and was > pushed from the maint branch (see http://orgmode.org/w/org-mode.git). Git has two types of tags: lightweight, which really aren't much more than a different way to mark the head of a tree without actually creating a branch at that point. The second kind is the annotated one, which is more like a commit - it comes with a description like a commit, just not with a change set. > Do you mean I need to annotate it? (I will do.) Yes, from the git-tag man page: By default (without --all or --tags) git describe only shows annotated tags. For more information about creating annotated tags see the -a and -s options to git-tag(1). This is a peculiar choice, but it makes much sense when considering that release tags would almost always be annotated ones (they could carry the changelog between releases for instance). Now if you use only lightweight tags for keeping track of various points in you Git history by name, git describe will still pick up the release tags and not your nilly-willy ones. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ SD adaptation for Waldorf microQ V2.22R2: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada