From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Sticky agenda status? Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 06:54:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87ty0okz95.fsf@altern.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55613) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SIYVg-0001tS-8v for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:53:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SIYVd-0001TI-UQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:53:23 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:40464) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SIYVd-0001TE-Kl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:53:21 -0400 Received: by wgbdr1 with SMTP id dr1so1955131wgb.30 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:53:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Kyle Machulis's message of "Fri, 13 Apr 2012 08:59:37 +0800") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Kyle Machulis Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Kyle, Kyle Machulis writes: > Just curious if the sticky agenda branch is going to land as a feature > at some point, or if there was some discussion on what's blocking it > that I'm missing? There was lots of action last month then silence, > and it looks like the branch has bitrotted against the trunk now. Was > kinda looking forward to it as a feature. :) I tried to merge the sticky-agenda branch but there is one merge conflict and I have no time to solve it right now. Max, Carsten, please go ahead with the merge against master when you think it's time: from what I've tested, the feature is stable/mature enough. -- Bastien