From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Change example timestamps to not occur in headlines Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:16:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87ty0a92it.fsf@gnu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56858) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SMGIm-0002zn-WB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 06:15:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SMGIg-0002ba-St for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 06:15:24 -0400 Received: from incoming2.cnam.fr ([163.173.128.34]:34530) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SMGIg-0002aC-MS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 06:15:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Samuel Wales's message of "Sun, 22 Apr 2012 09:00:13 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Samuel Wales Cc: Brian van den Broek , emacs-orgmode Hi Samuel, Samuel Wales writes: > On 2012-04-20, John Hendy wrote: >>>>> I've attached a small patch to the documentation that resolves a >>>>> conflict between the manual's advice not to include timestamps in >>>>> headlines and some of its examples where it does just that. > > Does this advice apply any more? Yes it does. > Perhaps it shoudl be removed. So no... let's stick to the current version of the manual. -- Bastien