From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suhail Shergill Subject: Re: org-html: subtree specific footnote references Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:31:04 +0000 Message-ID: <87txx74nqf.fsf@chaos.shergill.su> References: <87txxjuysd.fsf@chaos.shergill.su> <87zk7b72dj.fsf@chaos.shergill.su> <818vess2cb.fsf@gmail.com> <871ukk9rla.fsf@chaos.shergill.su> <81bojogrhh.fsf@gmail.com> <87bojoryw9.fsf@chaos.shergill.su> <81r4skf9ef.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36209) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sqp8a-0007YL-5q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:31:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sqp8Y-0006tQ-4A for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:31:12 -0400 Received: from mail-qc0-f169.google.com ([209.85.216.169]:60850) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sqp8X-0006sr-VH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:31:10 -0400 Received: by qcsd16 with SMTP id d16so3904712qcs.0 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:31:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <81r4skf9ef.fsf@gmail.com> (Jambunathan K.'s message of "Tue, 10 Jul 2012 11:24:48 +0530") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Jambunathan K writes: > Suhail Shergill writes: > >> i'm talking about a scenario where for one reason or another you may >> not want to do that, but may instead only want to export the most >> recent subtree which has been added (since the last time it was >> exported). > > You are trying to merge two /instances of export command/ and not two > /instances of subtrees/. It only so happens that, in your specific > case, you are selecting different subtrees for different export > instances. yes > What is the value of `org-footnote-section' in your case? the string "Footnotes" > Wrt footnotes, what you see in the Org file is not what the exporter > sees. Footnote definitions get collected in to the buffer at a suitable > point as part of pre-processing (see `org-footnote-normalize'). Also > footnote definitions can be placed by hand at arbitrary points through > out your Org file. hmm right. > I have a feeling that patch requires more additions. you're probably right. > Furthermore, you also need to submit a patch to org-e-html.el which will > replace org-html.el in the future. > I will let the owners of org-html.el to take over from here. *if* this patch makes sense, i'm willing to submit a patch for org-e-html.el. does anyone have any views? does this patch 'make sense', and is this the right place for it? -- Suhail