From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: "Generic" Source block language specification? Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 16:37:35 +0100 Message-ID: <87txsd3d8g.fsf@gmail.com> References: <50ACE060.4030207@gmail.com> <87vccw8a11.fsf@gmail.com> <87sj7y4jbe.fsf@gmail.com> <50B2392D.6030201@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38140) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TceL7-0007Uo-3E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 10:41:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TceL6-0003H7-2g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 10:41:49 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:34007) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TceL5-0003H3-Qo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 10:41:47 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id ds1so1497350wgb.0 for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 07:41:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50B2392D.6030201@gmail.com> (Rainer M. Krug's message of "Sun, 25 Nov 2012 16:28:45 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rainer M Krug Cc: Rainer@krugs.de, emacs-orgmode , Jambunathan K Rainer M Krug writes: > In a document, I have several source blocks with "real" code (i.e. bash and R in this case) Now I > have one block, which is not really source code, but which is "kind of" source code, in my case a > definition of a projection for a GIS project. Now I would like to have this definition of the > projection displayed in the exported document as the other source blocks, If I put it into an > EXAMPLE block, it is exported to LaTeX as verbatin and not listing, and all customisations ai have > for listings (smaller font, grey background, ...) do *not* apply to the EXAMPLE block, but woyuld > to a "fundamental" source block. So the EXAMPLE block is in this case not equivalent to the > fundamental source block. > > Hope this clarifies the difference, Yes, thanks. Since you use "listings" package, can't you define a new language (i.e. with \lstdefinelanguage{pseudocode}) and then use "#+begin_src pseudocode" block? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou