From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Schulte Subject: Re: Fwd: request regarding code chunk options in org-babel. Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 09:08:23 -0600 Message-ID: <87txofcp7c.fsf@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38617) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UFnI6-0006Ad-Uf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:08:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UFnI2-0005xG-5x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:08:30 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com ([209.85.160.44]:36275) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UFnI1-0005x8-Vt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:08:26 -0400 Received: by mail-pb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id wz12so1122289pbc.3 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:08:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (shripad sinari's message of "Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:37:43 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: shripad sinari Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org shripad sinari writes: > Hello all, > I have been using org-mode and particularly org-babel for reproducible > research. From reading most of the code chunk options in the org manual > it seems that the follwoing table would be how one would expect output > in various formats to behave: > > | :results value | :exports value | In Buffer | In PDF | Evaluation | > |----------------+----------------+-----------+--------+------------| > | silent | results | no | yes | yes | > | replace/other | none | yes | no | yes | > | silent | none | no | no | yes | > Perhaps the documentation should be changed to more clearly express that adding ":results silent" will inhibit insertion of results in the buffer even during export. > > However from this thread: > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/46625 Is there a reason that the solution posted in that thread does not work for you? Best, > > it appears that this is not the case. Is there a way, to get this > table to be valid out of the box? This might be useful. > > Please let me know. > Thanks and regards, > > Shripad > Tucson, AZ -- Eric Schulte http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte