From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Schulte Subject: Re: Limit on length of babel block #+name: value? Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 06:08:03 -0600 Message-ID: <87txm3p1p8.fsf@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53102) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ucwz1-0002Cc-ID for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2013 08:08:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ucwyw-0002eY-E8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2013 08:08:31 -0400 Received: from mail-da0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::236]:52962) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ucwyw-0002cS-6r for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2013 08:08:26 -0400 Received: by mail-da0-f54.google.com with SMTP id z17so1616643dal.27 for ; Thu, 16 May 2013 05:08:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (John Hendy's message of "Wed, 15 May 2013 23:41:09 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: John Hendy Cc: emacs-orgmode --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain John Hendy writes: > I was just completely baffled for about 5-10 straight minutes as to > why my block was not producing a results section with my generated > graphics file from an R block. > > I kept double checking my header options one by one despite having > simply copied/pasted/modified it from a previous working block. Turns > out it appears that #+name has a character limit! > > This (on Org-mode version 8.0.2 (release_8.0.2-65-g1e32d7)), doesn't work: > > #+name: improvement-treatment > > It appears the name can be 20 characters long (the above is 21). > I don't think there is any name length limit. The attached example works for me, and exports w/o problem to HTML. Maybe I'm not using the block in the same way as you, but I'm pretty confident there is no name limit and your problem probably lies elsewhere. --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-org Content-Disposition: inline; filename=long-name.org There is no name length limit #+name: improvement-treatment #+begin_src sh date #+end_src #+RESULTS: improvement-treatment : Thu May 16 06:04:20 MDT 2013 Calling this block. #+call: improvement-treatment() #+RESULTS: improvement-treatment() : Thu May 16 06:04:36 MDT 2013 and even longer #+name: improvement-treatmenttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt #+begin_src sh date #+end_src #+RESULTS: improvement-treatmenttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt : Thu May 16 06:05:04 MDT 2013 Calling this longer block. #+call: improvement-treatmenttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt() #+RESULTS: improvement-treatmenttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt() : Thu May 16 06:05:24 MDT 2013 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Best, > > Is this by design or something I accidentally uncovered? Forgive me if > it's come up before or is documented. I did a couple searches but > didn't see it. > > > Thanks, > John > -- Eric Schulte http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte --=-=-=--