From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: org-list-allow-alphabetical LaTeX export Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 09:54:27 -0400 Message-ID: <87txlakovg.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> References: <93BA1627-D7F6-4E96-9AFC-927A6F6C8C6E@gmail.com> <871u8ems4h.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> <339141F2-B786-4CD2-9611-F412FA773DEE@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34006) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ukx7q-0004jo-F3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 09:54:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ukx7p-00028A-7c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 09:54:42 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:60843) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ukx7p-00027z-09 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 09:54:41 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ukx7m-0004zd-5b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 15:54:38 +0200 Received: from pool-108-7-96-134.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([108.7.96.134]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 15:54:38 +0200 Received: from ndokos by pool-108-7-96-134.bstnma.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 15:54:38 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Josiah Schwab writes: >> However, the type="a" thingie in
    is a bad idea: it is deprecated in >> the HTML spec, so it would be foolish to go chasing after it in org. > > I'll take a closer look the rest of your message to tomorrow, but I wanted > to mention that while "type" was deprecated in HTML4 that is no longer the > case in HTML5. > > http://www.w3.org/TR/html-markup/ol.html#ol.attrs.type > OK - thanks for the pointer! -- Nick