From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Schulte Subject: Re: :session question -- and changes to #+Property: syntax Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 13:07:55 -0600 Message-ID: <87txl9u4c4.fsf_-_@gmail.com> References: <51501AF2.1070405@easy-emacs.de> <8738vjugwd.fsf@gmail.com> <51516699.6090604@gmail.com> <87ip4ezf93.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87fvzi72ve.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip4e5gai.fsf@gmail.com> <87k3nmd5es.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87sj264o0f.fsf@gmail.com> <87k3n8gf47.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <878v2l7v7s.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35571) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ul21l-0001vf-Qf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 15:08:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ul21k-0006bf-BD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 15:08:45 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f172.google.com ([209.85.192.172]:45023) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ul21k-0006bZ-4t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 15:08:44 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f172.google.com with SMTP id z10so1603585pdj.17 for ; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 12:08:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <878v2l7v7s.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of "Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:15:51 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Achim Gratz writes: > Achim Gratz writes: >> The change on the Babel side was just a few lines, but reconciling Org's >> notion of property syntax in various places proved to be more difficult. >> >> It's still not very well tested (it does survive the test suite >> obviously) and I'll need to write tests and documentation (help is >> welcome). Also, a new-style form of specifying header arguments for all >> languages (to then deprecate the old form) is missing at the moment >> since I'd like to get feedback on the language specific side first. > > No comments? > As I recall I was fully in favor of applying these changes, however I am not qualified to address the changes to property behaviors. Hopefully someone who works more on that side of things can address those aspects. Thanks, -- Eric Schulte http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte