From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Help with new exporter Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 12:20:22 -0400 Message-ID: <87txjz3g3d.fsf@gmail.com> References: <51DFEC7B.7050504@mpip-mainz.mpg.de> <51DFECE9.6010209@mpip-mainz.mpg.de> <87ip0f520a.fsf@gmail.com> <871u73eujy.fsf@gmx.us> <87ehb34ye5.fsf@gmail.com> <871u734x1k.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41507) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uxg5F-0002M5-6B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 12:20:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uxg5D-0002pZ-GN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 12:20:37 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:56874) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uxg5D-0002oO-6C for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 12:20:35 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Uxg5A-0005KB-Gg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 18:20:32 +0200 Received: from pool-108-7-96-134.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([108.7.96.134]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 18:20:32 +0200 Received: from ndokos by pool-108-7-96-134.bstnma.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 18:20:32 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org John Rakestraw writes: > On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, Nick Dokos wrote: >> I hope you are ultimately successful in producing exams that look >> exactly like you want them, using these mechanisms. But I have my >> doubts >> - you have won a battle, but the war is still raging afaict. OTOH, if >> you prove me wrong, I would be delighted! > > Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something (if so, please leave me alone > in my ignorance at least for a bit), but I'm thinking I've won this > particular war -- at least, I'm now able to use the exam document > class to produce an exam formatted to match my expectations. > Oh, I thought that was only the first step. At least, the experiments I was doing last night were *much* less successful, so I projected my problems onto you. In any case, I'm glad you can do that - and if I ever need to produce exams, I know who to contact :-) -- Nick