From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: bug#14975: 24.3; org-mode's `org-clock-notify-once-if-expired'
 doesn't respect `org-clock-sound'
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 19:22:55 +0200
Message-ID: <87txjcaro0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <87a9l67q2b.fsf@tue.nl>
	<87vc3sjpet.fsf__26121.076118625$1375181335$gmane$org@bzg.ath.cx>
	<87iozsjp8e.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <7ktxjcgi2o.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53454)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1V4Dea-0001yY-I8
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:24:14 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1V4DeU-0000Fq-Nk
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:24:08 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.14975.B14975.137520498623358@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <7ktxjcgi2o.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of
	"Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:53:35 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
Cc: 14975@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Glenn,

Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> writes:

>>> Please send those patches to the org-mode list first.
>>
>> PS: Maybe it's just me and I did not see the initial bug
>> report on this list -- ignore the heads up if that's so!
>
> If by "this list" you mean the org-mode list:
> It was initially reported to bug-gnu-emacs. Then I assigned it to the
> "emacs,org-mode" package, so that subsequent emails went to the org-mode
> list as well as the bug-gnu-emacs list. This would have happened with
> the initial report if it had specified a "Package: emacs,org-mode" line.
> (Though there seems no point in having "emacs" in there really.)

Thanks for the explanations.

This is what I expected, but I don't find the bug in the org-mode
mailing list.  The only reference I can find is my reply:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-07/msg01094.html

Does anyone receive this bug on the first place?  Or someone can
browse the archives better than me?

-- 
 Bastien