From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Remove the build-in orgmode Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 12:01:51 -0400 Message-ID: <87tx7yrpqo.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> References: <8738fn93h1.fsf@gmail.com> <8761ke5dvj.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45843) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wswaq-0007uL-7y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2014 12:02:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wswaj-0008Pw-Ip for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2014 12:02:12 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:46893) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wswaj-0008PZ-Bw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2014 12:02:05 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wswah-0004Gy-Ke for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2014 18:02:03 +0200 Received: from nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com ([66.187.233.206]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 06 Jun 2014 18:02:03 +0200 Received: from ndokos by nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 06 Jun 2014 18:02:03 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien writes: > Hi Thorsten, > > Thorsten Jolitz writes: > >> (On Archlinux) I simply trash the Org dir shipped with Emacs and put a >> symlink to my git-version of Org-mode there. I was told I shouldn't do >> that, but since I had many problems with mixed installs before, and no >> problems at all after doing so, I stick with this apparently 'bad >> habit'. > > I confirm this is a bad habit :) > I did that in the past (presumably for reasons similar to Thorsten's) and I don't bother any longer (overriding is simple enough as you point out), but the question still bugs me: what's so bad about it? The only reason I'm not doing it is laziness. Are there others? Nick