From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: ODT export: Issues with `org-export-footnote-first-reference-p' Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:23:51 +0100 Message-ID: <87twyqt060.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <54DA141C.1080407@gmail.com> <8761b9xxo9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <54DADEA3.8070701@gmail.com> <87k2zow3sq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <54DC2F94.90109@gmail.com> <877fvmvf44.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38619) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMGCm-0001ze-D3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:22:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMGCi-0002KG-Bz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:22:48 -0500 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:45522) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMGCi-0002K7-61 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:22:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Christian Moe's message of "Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:09:19 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Christian Moe Cc: Vaidheeswaran , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Christian Moe writes: > Would it make sense to be able to link to a footnote label? Rationale: > > 1. If a footnote definition is already meaningfully labeled, a dedicated > target is redundant. > > 2. Since you can link to named tables, source blocks etc., users might > expect to be able to do the same with labeled footnote definitions. > > So given a link like [[labeledfootnote]], could Org-mode look for a > footnote definition with that label -- e.g. after looking for a > dedicated target or a #+name'd element, and before doing a text search? > Or is there a reason why it shouldn't? First and foremost, mixing links and footnotes would be a maintenance burden. The link-target association does just that, and I think it is sufficient. Also, Org can renumber automatically footnotes, so it should also check every link in the buffer to possibly update it. I think it's a false good idea. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou 0x80A93738