━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ORG-CITEPROC TESTS Richard Lawrence ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Table of Contents ───────────────── 1 Org markup .. 1.1 Simple citations ..... 1.1.1 Parenthetical ..... 1.1.2 In-text ..... 1.1.3 With prefix and suffix data ..... 1.1.4 Citations to works with tricky field data .. 1.2 Multi-cite citations ..... 1.2.1 Parenthetical, keys only ..... 1.2.2 Parenthetical, with prefix and suffix data for individual works ..... 1.2.3 Parenthetical, with common prefix and suffix data ..... 1.2.4 All in-text, keys only ..... 1.2.5 All in-text, with common prefix and suffix 2 References 1 Org markup ════════════ 1.1 Simple citations ──────────────────── 1.1.1 Parenthetical ╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌ Some great ideas occur in books (Brandom 1994). Others in articles (Hofweber 2007). Still others are in collections of previously published work (Russell 2001), or in conference proceedings (Rogers 1996); sometimes they are the proceedings themselves (Rogers and Kepser 2007). Sometimes, a great idea can be found in a dissertation (Caponigro 2003), and sometimes on just a handout (Ross 1985). Some remain forever unpublished (Faraci 1970). 1.1.2 In-text ╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌ Some great ideas occur in books, such as Brandom (1994). Others in articles, such as Hofweber (2007). Still others are in collections of previously published work, such as Russell (2001), or in conference proceedings like Rogers (1996); sometimes they are the proceedings themselves such as Rogers and Kepser (2007). Sometimes, a great idea can be found in a dissertation, such as Caponigro (2003), and sometimes on just a handout like Ross (1985). Some remain forever unpublished, such as Faraci (1970). 1.1.3 With prefix and suffix data ╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌ Some great ideas occur in books (see Brandom 1994 chapter 7). Others in articles (Hofweber 2007 section 1). Still others are in collections of previously published work, such as Russell (2001 cf. section 3), or in conference proceedings (e.g., Rogers 1996). Sometimes, a great idea can be found in a dissertation, like an idea by Caponigro (see 2003 chapter 1), and sometimes on just a handout, like others by Ross (e.g., 1985). 1.1.4 Citations to works with tricky field data ╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌ In some cases, the authors have names which are tricky to represent in BibTeX, like N. D. Belnap Jr. and Steel (1976), or Väänäänen (2011). den Dikken, Meinunger, and Wilder (2000) has a lead author that should probably be capitalized in sentence-initial position. Sometimes, it's the journal name which is difficult (N. Belnap 1970). 1.2 Multi-cite citations ──────────────────────── 1.2.1 Parenthetical, keys only ╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌ Some great ideas occur in books, articles, or collections (Brandom 1994; Hofweber 2007; Russell 2001). Some occur in conference proceedings or dissertations (Rogers 1996; Rogers and Kepser 2007; Caponigro 2003), and sometimes remain unpublished (Ross 1985; Faraci 1970). 1.2.2 Parenthetical, with prefix and suffix data for individual works ╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌ Some great ideas occur in books, articles, or collections (see Brandom 1994 chapter 7; also Hofweber 2007; Russell 2001 is the locus classicus). Some occur in conference proceedings or dissertations (Rogers 1996; for an overview, see Rogers and Kepser 2007 and references therein). 1.2.3 Parenthetical, with common prefix and suffix data ╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌ Some great ideas occur in books, articles, or collections (For more on this topic, see Brandom 1994; Hofweber 2007; Russell 2001, and references therein). 1.2.4 All in-text, keys only ╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌ Some great ideas occur in books, articles, or collections such as Brandom (1994), Hofweber (2007), Russell (2001). Some occur in conference proceedings or dissertations like Rogers (1996), Rogers and Kepser (2007), Caponigro (2003), and sometimes remain unpublished, like Ross (1985), Faraci (1970). 1.2.5 All in-text, with common prefix and suffix ╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌ Some great ideas occur in books, articles, or collections. See: Brandom (1994), Hofweber (2007), Russell (2001), and references therein. Some occur in conference proceedings or dissertations. For more on this topic, see Rogers (1996), Rogers and Kepser (2007), Caponigro (2003). 2 References ════════════ Belnap, Nuel. 1970. “Conditional Assertion and Restricted Quantification.” _Noûs_ 4 (1): 1–12. Belnap, Nuel D., Jr., and Thomas B. Steel Jr. 1976. _The Logic of Questions and Answers_. Yale University Press. Brandom, Robert. 1994. _Making It Explicit_. Harvard University Press. Caponigro, Ivano. 2003. “Free Not to Ask: On the Semantics of Free Relatives and Wh-Words Cross-Linguistically.” PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles. den Dikken, Marcel, André Meinunger, and Chris Wilder. 2000. “Pseudoclefts and Ellipsis.” _Studia Linguistica_ 54: 41–89. Faraci, R. 1970. “On the Deep Question of Pseudo-Clefts.” Hofweber, Thomas. 2007. “Innocent Statements and Their Metaphysically Loaded Counterparts.” _Philosophers’ Imprint_ 7 (1). Rogers, James. 1996. “A Model-Theoretic Framework for Theories of Syntax.” In _Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics_, 10–16. Santa Cruz, CA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics. Rogers, James, and Stephan Kepser, eds. 2007. _Model-Theoretic Syntax at 10_. Association for Logic, Language; Information. Ross, John R. 1985. “The Source of Pseudocleft Sentences.” Handout of a talk given at New York University. Russell, Bertrand. 2001. “Descriptions.” In _The Philosophy of Language_, edited by A. P. Martinich, Fourth, 221–27. Oxford University Press. Väänäänen, Jouko. 2011. _Models and Games_. Vol. 132. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press.