From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Marking/highlighting text temporarily Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 18:56:59 +0200 Message-ID: <87twv9ken8.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87zj5xewsp.fsf@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <87iockmyxy.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87bnicshhc.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r3r57zre.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87lhhb2uot.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87oam7p6a7.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87mw1r865s.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <878udahabq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87pp6m5qy4.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <873837gyn9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d21yw6m6.fsf@pank.eu> <87lhgmrtrd.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87k2w6uit7.fsf@gmx.us> <87zj51ubpg.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <878uclua33.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59546) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YuOKG-0003lV-R7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 12:55:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YuOKF-0002O5-K7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 12:55:36 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:45442) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YuOKF-0002Ny-BJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 12:55:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <878uclua33.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Mon, 18 May 2015 18:25:20 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rasmus Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rasmus writes: > Fine whit me. For that I I have inlinetasks. Then it cannot even replace inlinetasks. > The tags. They are notes related to say a sentence, so you put a note at > the end of a sentence. Spatial TODOs. I still don't get it, sorry. > Its virtues are compactness, being similar to a list, being C-k friendly, > and, IMO, more intuitive. But, IMO, totally useless for general annotations. This probably means they shouldn't share the same syntax. Note I'm all for replacing inlinetasks with something else (i.e., change syntax), albeit this is no simple task. However, that was not my proposal. Regards,