From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: ox-latex: default packages cleaning Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 14:54:41 +0200 Message-ID: <87twte24j2.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87r3ok589c.fsf@gmx.us> <20150707193522.GB30985@chitra.no-ip.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58622) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZCosX-0005eP-4B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 08:55:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZCosS-0000Ax-A7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 08:55:09 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:43121) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZCosS-0000AC-2j for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 08:55:04 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZCosQ-0007rZ-TH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 14:55:03 +0200 Received: from ip5b4025d5.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([91.64.37.213]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 14:55:02 +0200 Received: from rasmus by ip5b4025d5.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 14:55:02 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Suvayu Ali writes: > I would also suggest removing inputenc. At the moment, it is loaded > with the AUTO option. AFAIK, this is redundant since most recent > (meaning for quite a few years) TeX engines already use the encoding of > the file if nothing is specified. A colleague of mine were missing her umlaut today cause she hadn't loaded inputenc with utf8. So I guess removing inputenc is premature. Rasmus -- . . . The proofs are technical in nature and provides no real understanding