From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make lexical eval default for elisp src blocks
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 10:19:30 +0200
Message-ID: <87twiwbskt.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <1461002134-49405-1-git-send-email-jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60981)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1asnK8-0005xd-G9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 04:17:25 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1asnK5-000307-BF
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 04:17:24 -0400
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:39897)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1asnK5-0002yf-4B
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 04:17:21 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1461002134-49405-1-git-send-email-jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu> (John
	Kitchin's message of "Mon, 18 Apr 2016 13:55:34 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: John Kitchin <jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

John Kitchin <jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:

> Set default in `org-babel-default-header-args:emacs-lisp'. Add an
> optional argument to the eval function.

Applied. Thank you.

However, it seems that some tests are now failing. I guess this is
related to Babel calls, which are eval'ed as emacs-lisp source blocks.

I have planned to change how Babel calls are evaluated during the next
days. This may make the failures disappear. Meanwhile, we could
force :lexical "no" in that case.

WDYT?


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou