From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: NULL Subject: Re: Emacs-orgmode Digest, Vol 131, Issue 15 Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 22:43:27 +0530 Message-ID: <87tw8wl2a0.fsf@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56724) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTtnl-0001tT-Dx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 12:13:38 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTtnh-0007BD-JG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 12:13:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: (emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org's message of "Fri, 13 Jan 2017 12:00:19 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org writes: > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 18:58:16 +0000 > From: Kaushal Modi > To: emacs-org list , Bastien Guerry > > Subject: [O] Hopes of making orgmanual.org the official manual? > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hello all, > > Are there plans to have the orgmanual.org ( > http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/org-mode.git/tree/contrib/orgmanual.org) > completely replace the texinfo version at some point? > > I believe that orgmanual.org was synchronized with the texinfo version when > it was checked in. But I fear that if this switching to org manual step is > delayed, there might not be enough motivation to keep orgmanual.org > maintained. > > -- > > Kaushal Modi > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 20:51:57 +0100 > From: Nicolas Goaziou > To: Kaushal Modi > Cc: emacs-org list , Bastien Guerry > > Subject: Re: [O] Hopes of making orgmanual.org the official manual? > Message-ID: <87eg08awf6.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> > Content-Type: text/plain > > Hello, > > Kaushal Modi writes: > >> Are there plans to have the orgmanual.org ( >> http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/org-mode.git/tree/contrib/orgmanual.org) >> completely replace the texinfo version at some point? > > The first step is to have orgmanual.org generate org.texi. We're not > there yet because there is no 1:1 correspondence between constructs used > in org.texi and Org syntax. > >> I believe that orgmanual.org was synchronized with the texinfo version >> when it was checked in. > > No, it wasn't even compiling when it landed in contrib/. Now, it exports > correctly. The process is slow, though, due to the sheer number of > macros (900+) and some code blocks at the end that can be removed. > >> But I fear that if this switching to org manual step is >> delayed, there might not be enough motivation to keep orgmanual.org >> maintained. > > Note that orgmanual.org is not maintained so far. A starting point would > be to try to update a small part of the manual and report what is > missing in "ox-texinfo.el". > > As a side note, I think we could use some free (i.e., noop in > "ox-texinfo.el") emphasis markers, e.g. "+...+", for additional syntax, > e.g., @key{...}, or @kbd{...}. > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas Goaziou > would love orgmode.org as manual. org manual in org!! -- ~nullx002 (somewhere on pale blue dot) github.com/nullx002 bitbucket.org/nullx002 twitter.com/nullx002