From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Possible bug in org-mode (MELPA version as of 1018-11-25) : #+language: is not (fully) honored. Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 15:07:02 +0100 Message-ID: <87tvk0q8op.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <7ecc5c8e82316b99d6a55b77a29f1a8d1e77ca5b.camel@gmail.com> <87sgzmk3fn.fsf@gmail.com> <87pnuqtggf.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <070afa36c50daaec4016356bbb36d2167f358616.camel@gmail.com> <87pnuqrsw4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <875zwhs3dr.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48705) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gSNCm-0004mu-Vp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:22:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gSMxJ-0006dr-H1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:06:18 -0500 Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.194]:39149) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gSMxJ-0006cm-A7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:06:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: (emanuel charpentier's message of "Thu, 29 Nov 2018 08:21:06 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emanuel.charpentier@gmail.com Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, emanuel.charpentier@gmail.com writes: > AFAICT, polyglossia is to be preferred to babel for use with xelatex or > lualatex. I'll see if this can be accomodated. What I mean is that you can also add compiler dependant packages in `org-latex-packages-alist'. No need to change the default package list. >> it should be ("AUTO" "babel" t). > > OK. That's much clearer. And does what is intended, BTW. > > Shouldn't that be default ?(No, I don't (yet) know *how* to do that..). Babel is no small package. I think it would be a bit invasive as a default package. However, it is a good candidate for user-defined packages, i.e., `org-latex-packages-alist'. > Thus introducing a serious problem : exporting to text or ODT works as > described, whereas export to latex needs (undocumented) supplementary > steps. > > At the very minimum, this need for further config should be mentioned > in the docs ; preferably, a default should be proposed. See above about the default. However, please feel free to suggest documentation improvements, however. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou