From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id cPMcEeEyn16eGgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 17:52:33 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id +BszLOYyn17nLAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 17:52:38 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1841941A34 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 17:52:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:33878 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQx4V-000247-LS for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 13:52:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38580) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQx3o-0001rZ-IN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 13:51:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQx3n-00055S-N3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 13:51:52 -0400 Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.230]:53779) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQx3n-00050u-0R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 13:51:51 -0400 Received: from localhost (40-67.ipv4.commingeshautdebit.fr [185.131.40.67]) (Authenticated sender: admin@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay10.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86B0624000B; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 17:51:46 +0000 (UTC) From: Nicolas Goaziou To: "Bruce D'Arcus" Subject: Re: adding paragraph folding to visibility cycling? References: <87d085xlte.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mail-Followup-To: "Bruce D'Arcus" , org-mode-email Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 19:51:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Bruce D'Arcus's message of "Sat, 18 Apr 2020 07:20:32 -0400") Message-ID: <87tv1cpw0e.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.178.230; envelope-from=mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr; helo=relay10.mail.gandi.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/04/21 13:46:15 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 217.70.178.230 X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: org-mode-email Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: -0.11 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [-0.11 / 13.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.56816140035053]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.51.188.0/24:c]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.23), country: US(-0.01), ip: 209.51.188.17(-0.57)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: eggs.gnu.org]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[209.51.188.17:from]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:209.51.188.0/24, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr,emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[nicolasgoaziou.fr]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-TUID: xDj3P6s/19SF Hello, "Bruce D'Arcus" writes: > Right now, I just keybindings for origami-toggle-all-nodes origami-toggle-node. > > But I was thinking to have this folding as a step between disclosing > all headings, and disclosing everything. > > Does that make sense? There could be elements between headlines and paragraphs, e.g., a drawer or a block. Why would you fold the paragraphs without taking care of the intermediate levels. Moreover, it adds steps in TAB cycle, which makes it slower. I'm not sure this is a great idea to add that to the global cycling mechanism. Or maybe the global cycling should be configurable, e.g., as a list of symbols that can be expanded with TAB. It could be complicated to handle intermediate steps, as explained above. As a data point, I wouldn't like to have to hit TAB five times before returning to the original visibility state. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou